Category Archives: Best essays and Research Papers

For this assignment, use the same hypothesis and t...

For this assignment, use the same hypothesis and the Literature Review from your IP1 (Part 2) assignment and compose a 2-3 page theoretical framework (Step 4 of the Sekaran & Bougie process). Use the components of a theoretical framework described in the Sekaran & Bougie textbook as well as the examples contained in the textbook and in published research. Additionally, use sources available on the Web, the library, and from the textbook to support your arguments. Remember to include these sources in the references section of your paper.

Students are required to prepare a poster on A2 ca...

Students are required to prepare a poster on A2 cardboard that provides a brief background to the  organisation on which they have based their individual reports, highlighting the industrial relations pressures identified in the essay and outlining the recommendations for addressing those issues. Students will be required to display these posters and engage in an interactive information session in the last two weeks of semester. Requirements of the poster: A2 poster on cardboard or similar eg could be an installation of some sort or a video recording.. Brief background to the organisation/industry Highlights industrial relations issues/pressures Illustrates use of appropriate literature and theory to develop plan to address these issues

In a minimum of 8 pages, you will create a final p...

In a minimum of 8 pages, you will create a final proposal on your original topic (Cyber bulling), taking into consideration the counter-argument or opposition to your position. You will need to establish both positions early on in your essay, and use those claims to develop a focused common ground thesis statement. Due to the variations in the counter-arguments you receive, you can choose from the following approaches:

Use the common ground you discovered between the two arguments to establish a synthesis a proposal that bridges your claim and the counter-argument. This will involve analyzing the counter-argument and discussing why specific points were valid and should be adopted and/or why parts of your original argument might be discarded or revised. Your thesis should be refined to balance the new information with the old. [This is a good choice for those working with a refutation that dismantled the logic of your claim, or a new counter-argument that was not ridiculously opposite from your own]
Establish a counter-counter proposal by refuting the new information based on its invalid reasoning or fallacious logic. You will still need to look at the common ground that you find between the arguments, but you will use that common ground to show why your original claim was stronger, and why the new claim is a poor choice. Do not simply dismiss the new argument, however. You might find that a new point arises from arguing against your peer, which will strengthen your own policy. [This is a good choice for those working with a counter-argument in direct opposition to your core values/policy, or those that don't offer enough new evidence to find a true synthesis.]
If you did not have a peer refute your original proposal, it is your job to seek out the opposing views yourself, and to directly address those counter-arguments before offering a new stronger proposal which refutes or integrates at least one of those viewpoints. This requires you to modify your original proposal to strengthen it against that opposition, or to adapt to the opposition for a more universally appealing and effective proposal.
Whichever approach you take, you need to view the opposition as you would a critical essay, which you are carefully considering before integrating into your own essay or refuting, and you should consider your topic carefully and what the best proposal will be to reach your specific audience and to make change.

Requirements: A strong essay will contain the following:

An introduction which addresses your specific audience and rhetorical situation
Consider claims of fact, and causality to help establish background.
Directly address your peer’s claim and establish the topic of debate.
A well-developed thesis statement an enthymeme or syllogism that directly responds to the task, by providing a proposal to address an existing problem and offers clear reasons for your decision this should be a revised proposal.
Strong topic sentences and paragraph structure (PIE)
Clear organization
Use of pathos, ethos and logos
Researched evidence to back up your claims and warrants
Support to back up your points/claims from both your and your peers sources.
At least 2 new research sources (since Essay #3)
Thorough analysis and explanation of supporting information
A thoughtful conclusion paragraph
Correct MLA format, page length, and in-text citation
A Works Cited page
A Cover Letter before the essay which gives your final reflection on your process, your writing, the topic, and the semester overall.

Song of Solomon”, “In the waiting room...

Song of Solomon”, “In the waiting room”, “Revelation”. Discuss about the involved initiation, revelation, and the transformation of consciousness. What is your take-away about the process of revelation? What is your understanding of what revelation is? Form a definition of revelation based on the three reading above and present it as your thesis in an essay in which you explain how each of the works contributes to your understand of the term. Be sure to do some comparing and contrasting as you try to identifying the core elements of revelation and explain how, despite some obvious differences, each supports your definition

During the third week of your internship, the CIO ...

During the third week of your internship, the CIO approaches your desk and says, “I need you to prepare a briefing on the process of selecting and acquiring an information system for our health care organization. Include how the goals of our organization and stakeholders affect the selection process. I must have this briefing this week so I can prepare for several meetings I must attend.”

• The process for selecting and acquiring an information system
• How the organization’s goals drive the selection of an information system
• The roles each of the organization’s stakeholders play in the selection and acquisition process

The story Heart of Darkness (The Norton Anthology ...

The story Heart of Darkness (The Norton Anthology World Literature; Volume F) and “Apocalypse Now” movie (youtube). The horror should first be explained by what it means to you in either or both The Heart of Darkness (text) and Apocalypse now movie 1979. Then you can apply it to either or both texts

The story Heart of Darkness (The Norton Anthology ...

The story Heart of Darkness (The Norton Anthology World Literature; Volume F) and “Apocalypse Now” movie (youtube). The horror should first be explained by what it means to you in either or both The Heart of Darkness (text) and Apocalypse now movie 1979. Then you can apply it to either or both texts

In your view, what do following epigraphs have to ...

In your view, what do following epigraphs have to do with professional ethics and problem/theme/ dilemma do you find in health care and advertisement? How does this shape your philosophical understanding of deception, truth, lies, privacy, confidentiality, and justice? How does it affect an approach to professionalism?

Do not search for truth, only cease to cherish opinions. – Sengstan, Zen Patriarch

Only those capable of silence exhibited the self-control making them worthy of trust?; the garrulous betrayed their unreliability at every turn. ? Sissela Bok, Secrecy

But to stand in the midst of this rerum Concordia discords (discordant concord of things) and of this whole marvelous uncertainty and rich ambiguity of existence without questioning, without trembling and craving and the rupture of such questioning, without at least hating the person who questions, perhaps even finding him faintly amusing ? that is what I feel to be contemptible, and this is the feeling for which I took first in everybody. Some folly keeps persuading me that every human being has this feeling, simply because he is human. ? Nietzsche, The Gay Science

Those who love their own noise are impatient of everything else. They constantly defile the silence of the forests and the mountains and the sea. ?It is the silence of the world that is real. Our noise, our business, our purposes, and all fatuous statements about our purposes, our business, and our noise: these are the illusion. ? Thomas Merton, ?Silence?

Radford’s Problem Radford argues that somet...

Radford’s Problem

Radford argues that something like the following view of emotions is plausible:

(RE) Emotions are affective states which have a cognitive pre-condition: It is only rational to feel an emotion if you believe that there is someone to whom your emotion is directed who is really situated in the way which would make your emotion appropriate.

How, then, can we reasonably be moved by the fate of fictional characters, since we know that there is nobody who is relevantly situated?

2. Radford and the Obvious Solutions

Sixth Solution: There are two sorts of being moved, one appropriate to real life, the other appropriate to fiction (so we are not really moved by the fate of fictional characters).

Radford objects: but even if this is true, there is too great a similarity between the feelings; how can anything at all similar be appropriate, when we know it’s only fiction?