Category Archives: Best essays and Research Papers

Kennedy, A.L. On Bullfighting. Knopf. Short Articl...

Kennedy, A.L. On Bullfighting. Knopf.
Short Article: “What is Sport?” by Roland Barthes
Select the statement from Barthes which you believe most loudly compels a close comparative reading of Ernest Hemingway’s “Death in the Afternoon” and Kennedy. The Barthes statement ought to be no longer than one or two sentences.
In this three- to four-page synthesis paper you will make a close reading of Hemingway and Kennedy in relation to that Barthes statement.
Be clear: Barthes opens up an area for discussion, but the thesis and body of paper are exclusive to Hemingway and Kennedy.
Overall Requirements for Synthesis
o This is a short thesis-driven paper. As such, it requires everything expected of a thesis: originality, precision, depth, insight, focus. And as with Paper 1, you are asked to make every effort to go beyond the expected when reflecting on Hemingway and Kennedy.
o Your thesis will be closely pursued through the paper. Each paragraph will serve to prove your thesis through a relevant main idea stated clearly in a topic sentence.
o Each piece of evidence from text will be analyzed in terms its significance to your argument. It is not good enough to leave the quotation hanging there; you must react to it.
o Lengthy quotation is not permitted; you must choose wisely and well, selecting that which speaks most directly and succinctly to your thesis.
Paper Organization for Synthesis
1. Place your short Barthes statement at the very beginning of your introductory paragraph. Yes, as the very first thing in the paper.
2. Contextualize: who is writing? what is the title of the piece? Explicate: what is at issue in this statement? This will lead into the topic for your synthesis paper.
3. Begin to set out your synthesis topic clearly, in sentences that show progress of thought: how does Barthes open up a topic area in the literature of bullfighting?
4. And how does that topic play through Hemingway’s and Kennedy’s writing about bullfighting?
5. Now get specific: the Hemingway-Kennedy thesis constructed within that topic. How are your authors connected? Your thesis is your argument within that connection.
6. Each body paragraph will serve to prove your thesis through a relevant main idea stated clearly
in a topic sentence.
7. Within each paragraph: judicious choice of evidence (textual quotations, followed by MLA in-text citation) to support main ideas, followed by measured analysis of that evidence. Each piece of evidence from text will be analyzed in terms its significance to your argument. It is not good enough to leave the quotation hanging there; you must respond to it.
8. Your conclusion should strive for far more than a simple reproduction and summary of the paper’s main ideas. Take the space afforded by that paragraph… and reflect, consider the ramifications of your line of argument, think about returning us to the key quotation, this time recast in different form… in other words, leave the reader both satisfied and curious.
Format Requirements and Professionalism
o MLA presentation of your name, course title, professor’s name and date. Numbered pages.
o A captivating title, with mention of the main authors under synthesis
o Double spacing. Times New Roman size 12 font.
o Flawless MLA in-text citation. Works Cited page with full MLA details for texts used. Works
Cited does not count as one of the paper’s pages.
I was already thinking about the Barthes statement: The last sentence of “Man has made his victory his spectacle, so that it might become the victory of all those watching him and recognizing themselves in him”.
If we decide to choose this statement he could use Hemingway’s chapter 7 and the end section of his book called “Some Reactions”. By doing this we would be talking about the crowd’s reactions and type of people that attend these type of events.

Analysing both the reaction of American citizens t...

Analysing both the reaction of American citizens to Khrushchev’s visit and Khrushchev’s own comments and critiques about his experiences in the United States: make an argument about the nature of Khrushchev’s trip and what it exposes about American society and values during the Cold War.
Your essay should be 7-8 pages, double-spaced, 12pt font, 1 inch margins. All direct quotes should be footnoted in Chicago Style. Feel free to incorporate any pertinent information you’ve learned in class, but the focus should be on the book. No additional outside research is required.

Write a 4 page paper in APA format. Include two sc...

Write a 4 page paper in APA format. Include two scholarly references regarding the topic.
- Compare the options provided by two major health care plans that facilitate the patient?s access to care
- Compare the options provided by two major health care plans that limit the patient?s access to care
- Evaluate the impact of DRG?s on treatment, length of stay, referrals and payment of service
- Evaluate the role of charity care within a health care facility

Assignment Guidance Your assignment deals with leg...

Assignment Guidance
Your assignment deals with legal issues which can arise in the business world. You need to identify the relevant issues, the law which is relevant and then apply the law to the issues. You need to explain whatever conclusions you draw. The process by which you arrive at your conclusions is as least as important as the conclusions themselves so you must set out your reasoning in applying the law.
Clearly you must read thoroughly. This means reading your lecture notes, the appropriate parts of the textbook and any secondary sources (journal articles) relevant to the issues it raises. Reading widely will inform your thinking and help you arrive at your own conclusions. A search of the Legal Journals Index (available via Westlaw) for articles may turn up useful sources. You should be aware that the best sources are legal journals (many of which are available in both hard copy and online – some are only available in hard copy in the library). Beware of other online sources – not all are of high quality.
A high quality assignment will:
• correctly identify and discuss the issues raised
• have a logical and coherent structure
• be relevant throughout
• give an accurate and knowledgeable account of the law
• provide academic argument (as opposed to narrative) and support that argument with evidence (legislation, case law, academic publications etc)
• refer to a range of legal and academic sources
• draw conclusions which are supported by the preceding discussion
• present discussion in a clear and articulate manner
• observe academic conventions (bibliography etc.).
In order to achieve this you should:
• organise your information into major issues, related sub-issues, interesting tangential points
• continually ask yourself: “why is this relevant?” Do this throughout your reading and do it when you’re writing your essay draft – it helps clarify your thoughts (and therefore your self-expression) and keeps your essay relevant
• have the confidence to leave some things out. It hurts, but the aim is not to impress your tutor with your encyclopaedic knowledge: it’s to use the most important of your information to the best effect. It’s much better to go for depth of discussion than to jam in everything on the subject.
• write a draft essay well in advance of the submission deadline. Leave it alone for a couple of days, then go back to it and read it through. You will almost certainly have ideas for improvements.
Assignment Question
‘In terms of the law, agency and distributions arrangements are essentially the same.’
• Format of your work: if you type your work, please use Arial font, pitch size 12 and spacing of 1.5. Please note: if your work is to be subjected to the JISC Plagiarism detection test, then your work MUST be word processed.
• Word limit: you must complete the assignment in a maximum of 3000 words. Bibliography, footnotes etc. are not included in the word count. Please do not abuse footnotes: they are not to be used for ‘hiding’ text that should be in the main body of your work. You should state the word-count on your work – please note that checks will be carried out.
• Sources used in this work should be referenced in accordance with the Harvard referencing system.
• Penalties for excessive word-counts: Once the word limit has been reached any excess material will not be assessed.

-Using Singin’ in the Rain as an example, descri...

-Using Singin’ in the Rain as an example, describe at least TWO common features of movie musicals in the ”the Golden Age” of Hollywood( late 1920s-1950s)
-Please refer to the content of the movie and the common features of the golden age. Please note that those are the basic requirements.
-If it helps, I think the presence of technicolor, the transition from silents to talkies and the nostalgic-driven sales message are all very common features of the golden age, and which can be found in the movie as well.

Review a decision you have observed in the workpla...

Review a decision you have observed in the workplace. If you have limited workplace experience, you may focus on a decision you have observed in another situation. You should only have observed this decision making situation; you should not have participated in it.
This review is comprised of three parts and requires you to:
1. The situation.Summarise your observation (300 words)
In your summary, include the following:What decision was made?Who made the decision? What factors influenced the decision?What was the outcome of the decision?
Your purpose in this part of the assignment is to demonstrate summarising skills.
2. Analysis.Use the theory of bounded rationalityto explain the decision making process in this situation. (700 words)
Your purpose of this part of the assignment is to demonstrate analytical writing skills.
3. Reflection. Explain what decision you would have made in this situation. Use the theory of bounded rationality to reflect on your reasons for making that decision. (500 words)
Your purpose in this part of the assignment is to demonstrate reflective writing skills.

Write a research paper of 1200 words. Do not give ...

Write a research paper of 1200 words. Do not give a plot summary; this is not a book report. The author(s) and work(s) must be selected from those we have read for this course. The topic must be one about which you have not previously written. At least 4 secondary sources are required. Select from the following essay prompts:
1. Analyze and evaluate the qualities and/or characteristics of the Victorian, Modern, OR Post-Modern age. Refer to specific authors and/or literary works to support your points.
?� Weak Topic: Addressing all of the qualities/characteristics of a period with little to no focus on the literature and without a specific or focused argument.
o Example: “The post-modern period focused on beliefs in nothing, a world without absolutes, the disjointed nature of man, and doubt.”
?� Strong Topic: Selecting characteristics that are relevant to a specific argument about the period and an author(s) and his/her work(s).
o Example: “Despite the post-modern emphasis on a belief in nothing and a world without absolutes, “Church Going” affirms that people are spiritually hungry and need to believe in something.”
o Example: Finding a connecting idea between a poem by Auden, Larkin, and Thomas, such as faith, belief, an aspect of religion, etc.
2. Analyze the Romantics’ enthrallment with Medievalism. Select specific works to illustrate the main ideas.
3. Discuss the theme of either earnestness or duty in the Victorian literature assigned, focusing on specific Victorian works to illustrate the main ideas.
4. Analyze the literary form of any work covered in this course.
?� Weak Topic: Incorrectly identifying the form of a work.
o Example: “’The Rape of the Lock’ is a play that mocks traditional epics.”
?� Strong Topic: Correctly identifying the form of a work and creating a specific and valid argument about it.
o Example: “’The Rape of the Lock’ is a mock epic that relies on several epic conventions, including an invocation of the muse, elevated language, and supernatural creatures, to satirize the vanity of contemporary society.”
o Example: Examining “Spring” by Gerard Manly Hopkins as an Italian sonnet.
5. Examine the allusions in Eliot’s poetry, focusing on “Journey of the Magi” OR “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock.”
?� Weak Topic: Attempting to address every allusion in both works without narrowing the focus or making a unified argument about the works.
o Example: “T. S. Eliot uses allusions in ?�Journey of the Magi’ and ?�The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock’.”
?� Strong Topic: Focusing on the allusions in one work and making a specific argument about them in relation to the theme or poem.
o Example: “Through the use of biblical allusions in ?�Journey of the Magi,’ particularly those in the second stanza, T. S. Eliot presents the picture of spiritual conversion.”
6. Compare and contrast works that contain characteristics of both the Victorian and Romantic periods, including “My Last Duchess.”
7. Examine Robert Browning’s use of satire in his poetry; focus on the aspects of society he satirizes. Be specific.
8. Interpret “The Lady of Shalott” from a feminist perspective. As a starting point, consider her confinement, the mirror, the loom, and/or Camelot.
9. Analyze the humor and irony OR biographical significance of The Importance of Being Earnest.
?� Weak Topic: Failing to tie in a discussion of humor and irony with the main theme of the play or simply summarizing humorous moments in the play; presenting the entire biography of Wilde and then addressing the play without making connections to Wilde’s life.
o Example: “Humor and irony are important in the play”; “This play is hilarious and I enjoyed it.”
o Example: “Wilde led a fascinating life, and his characters are interesting as well.”
?� Strong Topic: Tying in a discussion of humor and irony to a critique of what is being satirized; making clear connections between Wilde’s life and his play.
o Example: “Wilde uses humor and irony to criticize the repressive and often false morality of many Victorians.”
o Example: “Wilde struggled to preserve his identity in a culture that valued morality, and this struggle with identity is presented in both Jack and Algernon.”
10. Analyze Heart of Darkness’s presentation of British colonization, race OR women in Heart of Darkness OR evaluate Heart of Darkness in light of Achebe’s “An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad’s ?�Heart of Darkness.’”
11. Research the social, political, and/or historical context of a work. How do these contexts influence a specific work of literature?
?� Weak Topic: Presenting a list of historical facts about the Modern period without making connections to literature or an author.
o Example: “The Titanic’s sinking was a turning point in American history.”
?� Strong Topic: Making strong connections about a relevant historical event and a work.
o Example: “In ?�The Convergence of the Twain,’ Hardy uses the sinking of the Titanic to show human arrogance in assuming humans can control nature.”
• Research an important topic about the selected work(s) and use at least 3 secondary scholarly sources (plus the primary-text: story, poem, play, essay, etc.) that address the topic. Do not include any non-scholarly material such as Wikipedia, MasterPlots, CliffNotes, SparkNotes, or any publications on the internet. Electronic databases of previously published articles in journals are acceptable. Rely on scholarly articles, research databases, and books for information.
o Including no research will result in an “F” for the essay.
o Dictionaries, encyclopedias, and the Bible may certainly be used in this research paper; however, they will not count towards the 3 required sources.
? If you use an entry from a dictionary, the Works Cited/References/Bibliography page will have at least 5 entries: the primary text (story, poem, play, essay, etc.), the dictionary, and the 3 secondary sources.
• If your instructor has suggested revisions to your title, thesis statement, outline, and working bibliography, please incorporate those revisions in the final version of your Research Paper, which will then be followed by the essay itself.
• The essay must be double spaced, written in Times New Roman 12-point font, and use 1” margins.
• Revise and edit carefully.
• Format your paper using APA style.
• Document sources through in-text citations and an end-text Works Cited/References/Bibliography page conforming to current MLA, APA, or Turabian style guides.
• Do not use any material or words from another source without giving proper credit for that material or those words. To do otherwise is plagiarism and will result in a “0” on the paper. Each paper will be checked for plagiarism.
• Review the Research Paper Grading Rubric to learn more about how the research paper will be graded. Comply with all requirements.
• Include title page, thesis, outline and bibliography

a. This assignment requires that you select a quan...

a. This assignment requires that you select a quantitative empirical/research article (that is, the article should contain data used to answer a research question) and write a substantive critique of the article. The inclusion of data and its analysis is a requirement; therefore the use of an article that is merely a review of research articles or an opinion statement is excluded from consideration.
b. Guidelines are provided below. Please do NOT answer the questions in a YES/NO format. Instead please provide a substantial narrative when answering the questions.
c. Points will be deducted from this paper for failure to; comply with APA guidelines, use proper grammar, and use sentence structure.
d. A grading rubric is provided below and this must be attached to your submitted paper.
Quantitative Critique Guidelines
1. Title (5 points)
a. Does the title clearly and concisely describe the study?
b. Is the population/sample included in the title?
2. Abstract (5 points)
a. Is an abstract included in the article?
b. Does the abstract include a statement of the problem, purpose, and/or
c. Does the abstract briefly summarize the design, methodology, results, and
d. Is the abstract adequate? Why or why not?
3. Confidence in the Findings (5 points)
a. What are the qualifications and reputation of the investigator/s?
b. What evidence is there in this report that they are qualified to conduct this study?
c. Is this article published in a referred journal?
4. Theoretical Framework/Conceptual Framework (10 points)
a. Is a theoretical or conceptual framework described? If not, does the
absence detract from the significance of the research?
b. Does the research problem flow naturally from the conceptual framework?
5. Protection of Human Rights (5 points)
a. Is there evidence of an independent ethics review by a board (IRB) or a
b. Has the study been designed to minimize risk and maximize benefits to
c. Is there an indication that participants gave voluntary, informed consent?
d. Is there evidence in the study that individuals can be identified?
6. The Problem (10 points)
a. Was the problem statement introduced promptly?
b. Is the problem significant to nursing and is the significance described?
c. Has the purpose for conducting the research been explained?
d. What are the research variables and how are they measured/operationalized?
e. Will an answer to the problem provide insight into clinical applicability of the
7. Research Questions/Hypotheses (10 points)
a. Are research questions or hypotheses formally stated? If no, should they be
b. Do the research questions and hypotheses naturally flow from the research
problem and theoretical framework?
c. Does each research question or hypothesis contain at least two variables?
d. Are the research questions or hypotheses worded clearly and objectively? Is a
prediction evident?
e. If there is not a research question or hypothesis, write one for the study and
explain why your hypothesis or research question fits the study.
8. Review of the Literature (10 points):
a. Is the review comprehensive, logical and relevant to the problem?
b. Is the relationship to the research purpose evident?
c. Does it include recent research?
d. Can a case be made for conducting this study based on the review?
9. Research Design (5 points):
a. What design has been used for the study?
b. Is the design appropriate for the research question and the purpose of the
c. Has enough information been given to permit replication?
10. Sampling (10 points):
a. Is the target population carefully described?
b. Are sample selection procedures clearly defined?
c. Does the sampling method fit the research design?
d. Are potential sample biases described?
e. Is the sample sufficiently large?
f. Did the author/authors use power analysis to document that the study size was
adequate or inadequate?
g. How was sample size justified?
h. To whom can study results be generalized?
11. Data Collection (10 points):
a. Describe the instruments used for data collection.
b. Has rationale been given for the selection of instruments?
c. Are instruments congruent with the research question?
d. Are instruments suitable for use with the study sample?
e. Have procedures for testing the reliability and validity of instruments been
described? Are results sufficient to indicate their use?
12. Quantitative Analysis (5 points):
a. Is the link between the analysis and the findings logical and clear?
b. Is the statistical result presented clearly both in the text as well as in numerical
c. Are graphic displays clear and simple?
13. Conclusions and Recommendations (10 points):
a. What are the assumptions and limitations of the study? Are they listed or do you
have to infer what they are?
b. Are results of data analysis clearly explained in reference to research questions,
hypothesis and theoretical framework?
c. What recommendations for nursing practice and future research studies have
been made? Are these recommendations supported by the data?

In rash impulsiveness, tragic blunders, suffering,...

In rash impulsiveness, tragic blunders, suffering, and self-redemption . . . [Henchard] recalls King Lear at frequent points’ (F B Pinion, A Hardy Companion: 41).
Examine the character of King Lear in Shakespeare’s tragedy as a likely model for Henchard in Thomas Hardy’s The Mayor of Casterbridge

The Uniform Crime Reports posted by the FBI are an...

The Uniform Crime Reports posted by the FBI are an excellent resource when studying crime trends and many states have their UCR data posted on the Internet. You can find these by a simple “Google” search: [state] UCR statistics (e.g., Florida UCR statistics) – make sure that in the paper you include the URL used to obtain your statistics. Choose a state and compare the state-level statistics with the nationwide statistics. Write a formal paper summarizing the results of your comparisons.
With regard to the crime rates in your chosen state, look at any five consecutive years and focus on these two crime index offenses:
1. Violent crime – murder and nonnegligent homicide, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault
2. Property crime – burglary, larceny/theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson
• From year to year, did trends in your state mirror those nationwide? Where are the biggest discrepancies?
• From year to year, did trends in your state increase or decrease?
• Give the percentage change from year to year AND from the first year to the fifth
• Were there any years that stood out? For example, homicide rates in 2004 may have been much lower or higher than rates in the previous year and in the subsequent year
• What crimes are not reported in the data? For these crimes, how do you think their rates would compare to the rates of those reported?